Friday, January 11, 2013

Someone please explain this to me

My apologies for the blogging absence.

On the almost 1-month anniversary of the alleged "Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting", many questions remain. In fact, it seems that new ones are added daily.



Why was the United Way fundraising page for Sandy Hook created 3 days BEFORE the shooting?




Why was the "Sandy Hook Elementary Victims" fund on Go Fund Me started one day before the shooting? (starting at 0:43 in the above video)

Why are both shooting victims Emilie Parker, as well as Jessie Lewis, seen posing with Obama AFTER they were supposedly killed? (starting at 4:02 in the above video, and beginning at 0:38 in the video below)




Speaking of Emilie Parker, why is her father Robbie Parker seen broadly smiling shortly before his interview, in which he comes across as a terrible actor at best?



What is the deal with the medical examiner? (original source here)


An especially important yet greatly underreported feature of the Sandy Hook affair is the wholly bizarre performance of Connecticut’s top medical examiner H. Wayne Carver II at a December 15 press conference. Carver’s unusual remarks and behavior warrant close consideration because in light of his professional notoriety they appear remarkably amateurish and out of character.
 H. Wayne Carver II has an extremely self-assured, almost swaggering presence in Connecticut state administration. In early 2012 Carver threatened to vacate his position because of state budget cuts and streamlining measures that threatened his professional autonomy over the projects and personnel he oversaw.
Along these lines the pathologist has gone to excessive lengths to demonstrate his findings and expert opinion in court proceedings. For example, in a famous criminal case Carver “put a euthanized pig through a wood chipper so jurors could match striations on the bone fragments with the few ounces of evidence that prosecutors said were on the remains of the victim.”[4] One would therefore expect Carver to be in his element while identifying and verifying the exact ways in which Sandy Hook’s children and teachers met their violent demise.
Yet the H. Wayne Carver who showed up to the December 15 press conference is an almost entirely different man, appearing apprehensive and uncertain, as if he is at a significant remove from the postmortem operation he had overseen. The multiple gaffes, discrepancies, and hedges in response to reporters’ astute questions suggest that he is either under coercion or an imposter. While the latter sounds untenable it would go a long way in explaining his sub-pedestrian grasp of medical procedures and terminology.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zE0OT5od9DA
With this in mind extended excerpts from this exchange are worthy of recounting here in print. Carver is accompanied by Connecticut State Police Lieutenant H. Paul Vance and additional Connecticut State Police personnel. The reporters are off-screen and thus unidentified so I have assigned them simple numerical identification based on what can be discerned of their voices.
Reporter #1: So the rifle was the primary weapon?
H. Wayne Carver: Yes 
Reporter #1: [Inaudible]
Carver: Uh (pause). Question was what caliber were these bullets. And I know—I probably know more about firearms than most pathologists but if I say it in court they yell at me and don’t make me answer [sic]—so [nervous laughter]. I’ll let the police do that for you.
Reporter #2: Doctor can you tell us about the nature of the wounds. Were they at very close range? Were the children shot at from across the room?
Carver: Uhm, I only did seven of the autopsies. The victims I had ranged from three to eleven wounds apiece and I only saw two of them with close range shooting. Uh, but that’s, uh y’know, a sample. Uh, I really don’t have detailed information on the rest of the injuries. [Given that Carver is Connecticut’s top coroner and in charge of the entire postmortem this is a startling admission.-JT]
Reporter #3: But you said that the long rifle was used?
Carver: Yes.
Reporter #3: But the long rifle was discovered in the car.
 State Police Lieutenant Vance: That’s not correct, sir. 
Unidentified reporter #4: How many bullets or bullet fragments did you find in the autopsy. Can you tell us that? 
Carver: Oh. I’m lucky I can tell you how many I found. I don’t know. There were lots of them, OK? This type of weapon is not, uh … the bullets are designed in such a fashion that the energy—this is very clinical. I shouldn’t be saying this. But the energy is deposited in the tissue so the bullet stays in [the tissue].
[In fact, the Bushmaster .223 Connecticut police finally claimed was used in the shooting is designed for long range field use and utilizes high velocity bullets averaging 3,000 feet-per-second, the energy of which even at considerable distance would penetrate several bodies before finally coming to rest in tissue.]
Reporter #5: How close were the injuries? 
Carver: Uh, all the ones (pause). I believe say, yes [sic]. 
Reporter #6: In what shape were the bodies when the families were brought to check [inaudible]. 
Carver: Uh, we did not bring the bodies and the families into contact. We took pictures of them, uhm, of their facial features. We have, uh, uh—it’s easier on the families when you do that. Un, there is, uh, a time and place for the up close and personal in the grieving process, but to accomplish this we thought it would be best to do it this way and, uh, you can sort of, uh … You can control a situation depending on the photographer, and I have very good photographers. Uh, but uh— 
Reporter #7: Do you know the difference of the time of death between the mother in the house and the bodies recovered [in the school]. 
Carver: Uh, no, I don’t. Sorry [shakes head excitedly] I don’t! [embarrassed laugh]
Reporter #8: Did the gunman kill himself with the rifle?
Carver: No. I—I don’t know yet. I’ll-I’ll examine him tomorrow morning. But, but I don’t think so.
[Why has Carver left arguably the most important specimen for last? And why doesn't he think Lanza didn't commit suicide with the rifle?]
Reporter #9: In terms of the children, were they all found in one classroom or—
Carver: Uhm … [inaudible] [Turns to Lieutenant Vance] Paul and company will deal with that. 
Reporter #9: What?
Carver: Paul and company will deal with that. Lieutenant Vance is going to handle that one. 
Reporter #10: Was there any evidence of a struggle? Any bruises?
Carver: No.
Reporter #11: The nature of the shooting; is there any sense that there was a lot of care taken with precision [inaudible] or randomly?
Carver: [Exhales while glancing upward, as if frustrated] Both. It’s a very difficult question to answer … You’d think after thousands of people I’ve seen shot but I … It’s … If I attempted to answer it in court there’d be an objection and then they’d win—[nervous laughter]. [Who would win? Why does an expert whose routine job as a public employee is to provide impartial medical opinion concerned with winning and losing in court? Further, Carver is not in court but rather at a press conference.]
Reporter #12: Doctor, can you discuss the fatal injuries to the adults?
Carver: Ah, they were similar to those of the children. 
Reporter #13: Doctor, the children you had autopsied, where in the bodies were they hit?
Carver: Uhm [pause]. All over. All over.
Reporter #14: Were [the students] sitting at their desks or were they running away when this happened?
Carver: I’ll let the guys who—the scene guys talk—address that issue. I, uh, obviously I was at the scene. Obviously I’m very experienced in that. But there are people who are, uh, the number one professionals in that. I’ll let them—let that [voice trails off] 
Reporter [#15]: How many boys and how many girls [were killed]?
Carver: [Slowly shaking his head] I don’t know.

These are just some, VERY FEW, of the unanswered questions surrounding the Sandy Hook story. Time is the only limiting factor in how much info can be researched and shared on this. Don't believe what you read in the mainstream, government-controlled media outlets!!! 

False-flag attacks to bring about changes in law and usher us into totalitarianism are nothing new - think of Hitler burning the Reichstag, and his Night of Broken Glass, all in an effort to stamp out the supposed "terrorists" of his day - the Jews. 

Edited to add: I am NOT saying no crime was committed. I am NOT saying nobody died. I am saying that what we are being told is not what really happened. I don't have to be able to say what happened, just because I believe that what we are being told is not true. When looking for a perpetrator, it is always wise to see who benefits from the crime(s) committed. Who benefits from the aftermath of Sandy Hook? 


50 comments:

  1. Wow, thanks for putting this post together! Unbelievable...and yet it doesn't surprise me. Each story will bring us closer to our guns..scary times ahead. I wonder if this is it or if they are going to bring out now the straw that breaks the camels back?

    ReplyDelete
  2. The television show used to provide images of the first child actor, is Two and a Half Men, and the actor in question, Angus T Jones, is presently 19 years old. The images used in the video date from the mid-late 00s, he has grown up in front of television cameras for over a decade.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angus_T._Jones

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for pointing that out. I have removed the video.

      Delete
  3. I don't believe for a second that the Sandy Hook shooting is what it's being portrayed to be, however, I have to take issue with the last video. At least two clips of the 'child actors' are from years ago. Those children are now in their late teens/early 20s, so they can't possibly be the children we are now seeing in the interviews.

    Unless I am missing or misunderstanding something, this is a poorly done video and is just as fake as what the news is telling us.

    ReplyDelete
  4. As someone who works in the town over from this horrendous crime, I can promise you this is a true event. I personally know several people who can confirm the deaths of these innocent children and have attended their funerals. I drive by this area every morning. I drive by the children's new school every single morning. I'm not sure if it's because of your religious beliefs, your paranoia about the government, or you're truly that into conspiracy theories.

    If you think this is something set-up by the government, fine. I do not believe that one bit. Sure, the evidence sounds sketchy, but at the same time no one even has a clue as to why this young man did this. Personally, since people are claiming this young man had Aspergers, I truly believe his actions has a lot to do with his condition. I've worked with several people on the spectrum and those who are high function don't always know the difference between fiction and non-fiction. I believe between the evidence that he was playing violent video games, trips to the shooting range, and having Aspergers that this was a deadly mix for him. I truly believe that this wasn't a hoax and that this young man just couldn't tell reality from non-reality. Now this is not to excuse this terrible crime or to assume that those diagnosed with a spectrum disorder are often violent. I just think if you sit back and really think about this all for a second, it's way more logical and makes a ton of sense.

    I also want you to know that this is all coming from someone who believe certain, large events are/were a conspiracy. I highly respect your blog and your opinions, but I was extremely bothered that you think this is a hoax. I know you're a very intelligent women and that you can take a minute or two to really re-think this.

    Ashley

    ReplyDelete
  5. You can get inaccurate dates on google searches by using a date-restricted search.

    The Emilie Parker family photo is an old photo. That is her younger sister in the photo with the President. She is either wearing Emilie's dress or she has an identical dress. That is not unusual.

    I have no idea why Robbie Parker was smiling. I would never attempt to judge the actions or the emotions of a grieving parent who had just lost his child in a tragic shooting.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'd think that a mother of 7 kids might realize that children often resemble their siblings and wear each other's hand-me-downs. Doesn't make it a huge conspiracy.

      As for her father being a "bad actor" grief can manifest in different ways. Sometimes people do laugh and smile in uncomfortable situations.

      Delete
    2. Exactly, MsJess! Here is another photo of the President with Emilie Parker's two younger sisters. That little boy is not Jessie Lewis. The other 3 children in the photo are Emilie's cousins.
      http://www.globalpost.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/gp3_fullpage/obama_photos_newtown_kids.jpg. If it was a government conspiracy, why would the President be posing in photos with supposedly dead children?

      Here is another video of Emilie's parents when they were interviewed by Katie Couric. The mother is so distraught she can hardly speak, and her face looks like she has been crying for days. Also, if Robbie Parker is an actor, he has been playing the role of Emilie's father for at least 6 years, because there are facebook photos of him dating back to the time when Emilie was a baby.
      http://www.courant.com/news/connecticut/newtown-sandy-hook-school-shooting/hc-emilie-parkers-parents-the-only-way-to-move-forward-is-to-think-about-these-beautiful-children-20121219,0,6416500.htmlstory

      We will never convince these conspiracy theorists that these events are not part of a conspiracy, because they want to believe in a conspiracy for whatever reason, so they grasp at straws to try to prove their point. I usually ignore such posts, but I felt compelled to respond to this because it involved the deaths of 20 young children. For someone to say that it is part of some kind of coverup or conspiracy is to dishonor their memory, in my opinion, and to say that their parents are not really grieving is cruel.

      Delete
  6. Oh my, they did the same thing for 9/11!! https://www.google.com/search?q=world+trade+center+bombing+2001&hl=en&tbas=0&biw=1092&bih=544&sa=X&ei=cnvwUN2cKrOA2AWbhYGwBA&ved=0CCIQpwUoBg&source=lnt&tbs=cdr%3A1%2Ccd_min%3A1%2F1%2F2001%2Ccd_max%3A1%2F31%2F2001&tbm=#hl=en&sugexp=les%3B&gs_rn=1&gs_ri=serp&tok=okLG9ijTPwgIdT-u3j_qPg&pq=world%20trade%20center%20bombing%202001&cp=8&gs_id=v&xhr=t&q=9/11+bombing&pf=p&tbo=d&tbs=cdr:1%2Ccd_min%3A1%2F1%2F2001%2Ccd_max%3A1%2F31%2F2001&sclient=psy-ab&oq=9/11+bom&gs_l=&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.r_qf.&bvm=bv.1357700187,d.b2I&fp=70f902665fe3d8c&biw=1092&bih=544

    The explanation of the Google date is that whoever did that searched used one of Google's own search tools to deliberately falsify their "evidence". I can provide a more detailed explanation if this isn't enough.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Once again, you are not doing the research. The girl with Obama is Emilie's sister.

    Also, the date on the web search is possibly from incorrect coding of the web page.

    ReplyDelete
  8. My sister in law's youngest son went to Sandy Hook elementary. Those 20 children are dead. It's a fact. If you want to go on believing that it's all a conspiracy from the government go right ahead.

    If you really want to be into conspiracy's I have a website for you
    wellaware1.com. The owner of this website is one of the people who started the entire Sandy Hook hoax by insisting that two of the grieving parents were actors. He thinks everyone in the government is an actor and that EVERYTHING is a conspiracy. For instance he believes that Bing Crosy was also Adolf Eichman the Nazi war criminal, that Walt Disney and Adolf Hilter were the same person and that he was actually Teddy Roosevelt's son, that Hilary Rodham Clinton is actually the same daughter that George and Barbara Bush lost in infancy. But my favorite is that Nelson Mandela and Morgan Freeman are the same person and are (is) the father of Jimi Hendrix.

    As far as the rest of it goes, the man is a coroner and let's face it you have to be a 'special' kind of person to do a job like that and he may not appear normal to the rest of us.

    And the dad, you can't say how you will react until you have been in that persons shoes. Coming from someone who has had a lot of death in her family, you can only cry so much.

    I pray that if something ever happens to one of your kids that no one sits in judgement of you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And I pray for you Sassy BlackWhiskers, that you don't belong to that satanic coven in Newton and tell us lies here!!!

      Delete
    2. Sorry, it is Newtown, not Newton. Here another staged parent interview with anti-gun propaganda: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LypG2ACkyQE

      Delete
  9. The shooter's mother was a paranoid conspiracy theorist who had guns.

    Just sayin'....

    ReplyDelete
  10. I pray that none of the families that lost loved ones in the tragedy ever hear of these crazy conspiracy theories. These are real families who really did lose their children. The little girl in the video is Emilie's little sister. Siblings do often look very similar and often have the same outfits or share outfits. The father smiling? Many people do not act "appropriately" under such tragic circumstances. Grief does strange things to your mind. Everything is so overwhelming, you don't know how to react. I, myself laughed, when I learned of my grandfather's heart attack, it all seemed so absurd at the time, considering how healthy he was. I didn't know how to react. I was devastated, but it was days before I could cry. As to the coroner, he's not a ballistics expert (that's a different field) and he had just conducted the autopsies of several young children. I'm not surprised he seemed out of sorts. I don't know anyone, who after just examining the bullet riddled bodies of six year olds who wouldn't be upset and possibly get the facts a bit muddled. I know you would be devastated to lose one of your children, especially in such a violent way. I wish you would extend christian courtesy to these families and stop spreading obvious lies.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I believe it happened. I believe it is a conspiracy of the government. The timing too coincidental and there are inconsistencies in the story that are disturbing.

    ReplyDelete
  12. The only thing shocking about this whole shooting, is the ignorant American people. Just believing every word, the perverted media spews out. They are little sheep being led to a massive slaughter. Wake up people. How can't you people read between the lines? Just try to use your head for five seconds.

    They have an agenda. Just read the news articles. They are becoming more and more open and blatant about their plan to off us and have complete rule; They are going to take your guns,they are going to kill you, they are going to raise taxes, food and gas so high, your head will spin...... and it is coming at a faster rate than we could have imagined. THEY DO NOT CARE FOR YOUR WELL BEING! Oh, God help us. Please.

    Our president is one big fat disgusting joke, the governmet as a whole, is the most wicked organization on the planet. Media right there with them.

    The people are full of stupidity, and we are all going to pay for such ignorance. Please wake up!!!!

    Honestly, if people would wake up and take a stand, we may have hope. Sadly, I think the people are too dumb.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wow, I'm just curious as to why you think the government wants to do this? What do they gain? There are 311,000,000 (Three hundred and eleven million) people in this country. Do you really think "the government" has the ability to take away everyone's guns. . . to move us all to internment camps. . . to slaughter us by the thousands. . . again, what would be the point?

      Staying anonymous just because I don't want to get into a huge debate, I'm just really interested in your thought process.





      Delete
    2. Taking my time to answer you, anonymous, is a waste of time. I think you know me. You staying anonymous, has nothing to do with a debate you want to avoid.....what would it matter if I knew your name? I am sure I already do!

      Delete
    3. I don't have a clue who you are, nor do I care. I was honestly curious, because I don't understand what you think the government would gain from such actions. If you can't explain your thought process or you don't want to answer that is fine, but there is no reason to be accusing me of some false identity. No worries.

      Delete
    4. http://theintelhub.com/2013/01/19/sandy-hook-smoking-gun-revealed-factions-of-government-law-enforcement-and-mainstream-media-including-anderson-cooper-engaged-in-treason-against-the-united-states-and-its-citizens/

      Delete
  13. Good job Zsuzsanna! I'm so glad to see someone else who isn't afraid to speak the truth about this evil and vile government we are stuck with. I pray the Lord will continue to bless you with this discernment. Missi Kelley

    ReplyDelete
  14. I don't think I could sleep if I had the distrust of the government that you have.

    If you moved back to where you were born, would you be as distrustful of the government there?

    Were you this distrustful of George W. Bush?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Susan, the problem is this is a global issue. It is called the New WORLD Order, that means it affects the whole planet. We had false flag attacks here in Germany, too. There is no country to escape to, which European country should Zsuzsanna go to, most of them are in the EU or planning to become a member of the EU. So you can just as well stay in the country you live in, whether it is Germany, Hungary or the US. All gouvernments are corrupt. This is the reason why citizens all over the world, from Timbuktu to Colorado should have the right to own guns.

      Delete
    2. The church of Satan is located at Newton, Conneticut. Oh, what a coincidence!!! "If you would like to recieve an official information packet on our Church of Satan outpost in Connecticut, (AKA Church of Tiamat) or if you have questions, write to: Curtis M. LeBlanc [zdervish@gnn.com], PO Box 3184 Newtown, CT 06470". Found that on http://www.satanservice.org/theory/coscm.txt. Someone on the internet suggested that the whole town of Newton is a satanic coven.

      I have also seen the interviews of some Sandy Hook parents on TV. Everyone who has ever lost a loved one like a child, husband etc. will recognize that these peoples behaviour does not seem to be authentic: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6c_6JzSqr2w

      My explanation of the events:

      Option 1: everythings has been staged by gouvernmental and Newton satanists, nobody has died.
      Option 2: everythings has been staged by gouvernmental and Newton satanists, some people have died either in the planned shooting or later in a satanic ritual.

      Also quite coincidential that popstar Kei$ha has released a song called "die young" on 25 September, time enough to climb the charts until the shooting occured. The video of the song is filled with satanic symbols, I am talking about upside down crosses, sex orgy in a church building, blood stains on faces etc. "In it, she [Kei$ha] plays the role of a cultist, leading her disciples in a sex ritual." (info from Wikipedia). The song has later been removed from the radio stations because some people noticed that the title seems quite offensive and mocking in light of the school shooting. However, this song is at the top of the charts and you can hear it blaring from teenagers ipods all around. Kei$ha has also been spotted drinking blood from an animals heart (not clear if this was a real heart) at a stage gig. Satanism is alive and kicking in the US.

      Delete
  15. Hello Zsuzsanna,

    I have heard about Obamas and the discussion of executive orders concerning guns. I think this is preparation for war against all conservative and especially christian citizens of the US. I am so sorry about this and I also believe that Sandy Hook is a hoax. Reminds me a lot of a school shooting in Germany, which was also used to tighten gun control laws. I have to thank the US a lot especially when it comes to my faith, because most recources I use are from US preachers. You and your family are in my prayers. I also pray for all true christians in the US. Whatever might happen, never forget:
    "And we know that all things work together for good to them that love God, to them who are the called according to his purpose."

    God is in full control, He is in control of the whole universe. If Obama decides to slaughter US-Christians, their blood will be on him, and God will one day demand justice for that.

    Love, blessings and hugs from Germany.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Interesting article: "Prominent rifle manufacturer killed in mysterious car crash days after posting psych drug link to school shooters" on http://www.naturalnews.com/038616_John_Noveske_mysterious_death_car_crash.html




    ReplyDelete
  17. This is a very far-fetched (dare I say CRAZY??) blog posting. Of COURSE the medical examiner didn't have all the answers, he didn't shoot the children, and he wasn't the only one working the scene/doing autopsies. No one will ever be able to answer all the questions about this tragedy.

    The fact remains there are crazy people in this world and there always will be. They will commit murder and cause terrible tragedies until Jesus returns.

    Not everything bad that happens is a 'conspiracy'. To be quite honest, reading posts like this concern me a great deal--not because I think they're true, but I wonder what goes on in a person's mind to cause them to twist everything around like this.

    ReplyDelete
  18. A friend of mine in Connecticut knew the parents of one of the children killed and went to the funeral. Should I ask her for a program? I suppose that could be faked too.

    I'm flabbergasted by this post. No concern for the families of this tragedy and all self-serving conspiracy theories. It just seems very unchristian.

    ReplyDelete
  19. I'm 100% confident this was a planned event that is just part of the plan. It IS a deception, but to what extent, I'm not sure. However, it's important we carefully sort out valuable evidence from distracting garbage. I think the false "evidence" out there has a purpose. Conspiracy truthers like to accumulate as many details as possible to add to the case. But I think that's the most damaging thing to do. Some of the conspiracy "evidence" stuff put out there is easily debunked or debated. The result is the whole idea of the conspiracy being discredited, which by default puts credibility back on the side of the "official story" from the media.

    I am going to have to do this in 2 or 3 comments, since my comment is like a book- lol.

    The bad "evidence"-

    Dates and websites- Whenever something comes up about a Facebook page or a date a site was started or something on a website, I have ALWAYS ended up just filing that away in my mind as possibly being a piece to the puzzle, but NEVER putting a lot of weight on it or using it as major evidence. I am always "too late" to witness it myself (the page is always taken down or changed by the time I come along), so I am always left to trust someone elses screenshot of their discovery. I usually don't waste my time with this type of evidence. I don't think it's logical to believe that they can pull off these events in front of everyone with such craft, yet they're dumb enough to sloppily let FB pages slip or set up things with dates before the event. They know people are going to be scrutinizing this stuff, and I don't believe they'd be that sloppy unless it was intentional. I am not so arrogant to think I am going to catch them in the act. I think they are always 2 steps ahead of us and have the process down pat. I'm not saying it's impossible for something to slip. In fact, with so many details involved, chances are something will here or there, but these date discrepancies seem to always come up. How come they don't learn their lesson?

    Pictures with Obama- I saw one video claiming the girl was Emilie based on the hair part and the dress. I could easily tell the child with Obama was NOT the same child that they showed as the victim, Emilie. The face shape and proportions just weren't the same- just the hair. Well, to me it looks like the little sister grown up a bit. Just because her part was in the middle as a young toddler doesn't mean anything. Of course her part was in the middle- she was wearing pigtails! I wasn't even sure it was the same exact dress, but it probably is. It would make sense that the nice holiday dress would be passed down to little sister and that she would be wearing it at the important occasion of meeting the president (gag-LOL). But once again, I refuse to believe they are that dumb. If they can pull of such a thing (seems to be what they do best these days), they don't need to resort to "darn, we ran out of actors; the victims will have to double as the siblings of the victims and hopefully no one will notice." The claim that it is Emilie is so easily shot down that it damages the truth. People rightfully dismiss it as nonsense, but then they hesitate to even look at anything else that is presented which may be really good evidence. I am starting to believe some "exposing" videos are posted by the same organization to discredit the conspiracy idea.

    There is a "main stream" media, and it's very apparent to me that there is also a "not main stream" media at work as well. That's what we really have to watch out for.

    See next comment for the worthy evidence in my opinion...

    ReplyDelete
  20. cont...
    The evidence that is more worthy in my opinion-

    Robbie Parker- Wow. I was shocked when I saw a more complete video of his interview. The first one I saw seemed like he was a parent trying to keep his composure during the interview, which is the impression you get from the point he actually is at the microphone. However, when I saw a video that included him walking in, I couldn't believe the difference in my perception. He seemed SO relaxed and cool, complete with smirk. Then after he got up there, he worked himself into emotion. Weird. Watching it without the beginning gives you the impression that he had to "pull himself together" to get through the interview. But in reality he went from TOTAL light-heartedness to creating the fragile emotional state on the spot. Having this new perspective, I watched him begin the interview and soon decided he was lying! Why does he have that lying facial expression when simply introducing himself? The cocked eyebrow, the smirk on his mouth, and head movement just was not natural to me for someone to say "my name is..." He told me right there that he was lying. His body language was fighting that first sentence like it wasn't true. People can say we are all different and not to judge. But that's silly. Can someone say not to judge them for failing a lie detector test, because "we all respond differently?" There ARE clues that tell you something isn't right. There are certain aspects of our nature that are NOT very unique at all. Intuition comes from our experience and we know something isn't right whether we can put our finger on just exactly what it is or not.

    Other fake witnesses?- That's also the feeling I got with the blond teacher who also does an emotional performance, wiping a tear that wasn't there. There were no real tears, no red eyes, no eyes that filled up with water before trickling a tear. Yet she wiped her cheek anyway. Why? because that's what actors do to make the portrayal of emotion seem more real? Her interview seemed like pure acting to me, even her lines didn't seem authentic to me in substance, nor in delivery. There was another invisible tear wiping witness, but I don't remember who that was. I also can't get over the parents that were very relaxed during the WHOLE interview. As a Christian parent, I know of the peace that's possible knowing my child was safe in heaven. However, I can NOT relate to being able to display that peace and remain so cool less than 48 hrs after I lost them... especially recalling their positive traits to the world, since they are now gone and would no longer be here to bless us all with those traits. That would make me cry. Again, I think that surely most of us would be similar in that. WHO can not crack a tear while recalling the wonderful things about their precious child less than 48 hrs after losing them? It's bizarre. They were just so calm and smooth.

    The creepy old man that found the kids near his home and kept them in there for awhile before taking them to the station (YIKES!) just kept rambling out all kinds of sad tales. I agree with someone who said it seemed like it was his audition video to be in the cast. lol.

    The coroner or whatever he was- WOW. My husband and I got a good laugh from that one. I was thinking...That poor guy- his role is to be thrown up here to answer questions about something he has no clue about or he didn't have time to properly study his lines.... is he even really what they say he is, because I think they could've gotten just as meaningful of answers from someone they picked up off the street. I didn't hear one single professional response come out of him. He was either CLUELESS or under EXTREME pressure to perform a certain way or BOTH and wasn't very good at coping with it if you ask me.

    ReplyDelete
  21. cont...

    Conclusion:

    Anyway, I 100% know that some powerful organization is behind it, not just some crazy kid. They are behind it regardless of how complicated or simple the execution of it was. I don't have to figure it all out. They're so good at this, I don't believe anyone could figure it out. But people need to know it's not all or nothing. If there is bad info, don't throw it all out. Some info is good, some is not. Some is questionable, some is undeniably suspicious. You don't have to have the story all figured out to know the media version is not the truth. Like Szusza said, look at the result of the incident.. Who benefits? What kind of emotion and climate did it flare up in the nation? What will be accomplished as a result? This will lead you to the answer. You don't need to have it all figured out to know the general truth.

    I do think it is important that we use discernment and weed out the weak stuff if you plan to try to convince others. If it turns out not to be solid, they'll go running back to the media they think they can trust. They are programmed to trust the mainstream media by default, and if any little snippet of bad info is found on the side of the conspiracy theories, then they throw it all out. If they can't trust one or two things, then they hesitate to trust any of it... Which seems logical. That's why it works. So let's be careful with what we use to try to convince others with. For trying to convince those I care about, I really have to stick to things that hold up better under scrutiny- things that I myself really believe after examining it repetitively.

    ReplyDelete
  22. I'm so glad I'm saved, born again and on my way to heaven - my true home. This world is not my home and what a wonderful relief it is to recognize that the lost world will always be the lost world and will always do horrible things. I'm so glad I have the freedom to spend my time on spiritual things and ignore worldly events that have no effect on my spiritual life or salvation whatsoever. What liberty in Christ.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Thank you for this, and the encouragement it brings. God says the nations are 'as but a drop in a bucket, and are counted as The small dust of the balance' Isaiah 40:15. God is in control. What a comfort! 1 Tim 2 reminds us we must pray for those in authority. I am sure we need to do this more than ever.

    ReplyDelete
  24. This is truly upsetting to me. Nothing has made me this upset in a while as this blog post has, especially some of the comments. People have a right to their opinions but as confessed followers of Jesus Christ you need to think about how your comments come across. I think Jesus would be mourning with the families of the victims and not passing judgment on how someone reacted to such a tragedy. It was hard enough to hear the news but to hear so called Christians lacking such compassion was such a blow to me.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Stephanie, if this blog upsets you, I suggest you find a different place to go to in the future, since Zsuzsanna is very political and I am sure this will not be the last post that makes you feel uncomfortable. Also, Zsuzsanna does point people to Jesus probably more than anyone who writes comments here, through regular door-to-door-soulwinning. Stephanie, are you doing any of that?

      Delete
  25. How many coincidences does it take for sheeple to realize maybe it's not coincidence? The latest info I've picked up is that there was FEMA training going on the day of the shooting about 15 miles away. The title...."Planning for the Needs of Children in Disasters" ...But wasn't FEMA already present to conduct terrorism training on 911 also? And there was that bus that actually did blow up the very day of training for that as well. Wow, I am so impressed. These people are always at the right place at the right time...right before the event happens!

    I just searched this for myself and you can too. Google search "FEMA L-366" The first two listings on google are what I looked at. The first one is the state of connecticut emergency management description of the training event. http://www.ct.gov/demhs/ical/eventDetail_page.asp?date_ID=CAC9C6C9CD83CDC9C7

    The second listing is a downloadable document that has the title and looks like some kind of registration form or something. You can see on this document that the one on the day of Sandy Hook was actually the 4th training scheduled in Connecticut within a month.

    Too coincidental for me to believe these FEMA trainings are not connected. Especially since the nature of this training was not just any disaster or terrorism training, but specifically "Planning for the Needs of Children in Disasters." scheduled about 15 miles away the same day? really?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You are right about what you say, but I think it even goes yet deeper. Like who's really steering this planet and what's the true agenda. We need to keep an eye on the Vatican - a very close eye!

      Delete
  26. I don't understand why people think they have to know everything. So many comments about "them" not telling us the truth or the "whole" story. What does it matter? Why is there a need to know every single last detail and every motive and circumstance behind a tragedy or any other news worthy event like this? A man murdered a bunch of innocent children and they are dead. It's as simple as that. If you really think that our government or other "powerful organization" needs an event or an excuse like this to further an agenda, you are sorely naive. Christians need to stop being so fearful and start being more kingdom minded. This country is not your final home. God calls Christians in other countries to live in far worse circumstances and conditions than we do. As Christians, we already know the end of the story. God wins. All that matters. Place your trust Him, not your Constitution or your guns. God hath not given us a spirit of fear, but of power, of love and of a SOUND mind. Some people thrive on drama and controversy. I don't know what kind of readership this blog has, but it's shameful that instead of using this platform to point people to Christ, it's being used to spread fear, confusion and despair.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This is so true, and a timely reminder. Thank you.

      Delete
  27. Ok, a young politician from Nevada wants Obama to put him on his kill list:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=axmjLxNFCAY

    ReplyDelete
  28. http://news.yahoo.com/why-sandy-hook-massacre-spawned-conspiracy-theories-184323398.html

    ReplyDelete
  29. Here's a good explanation
    http://www.reddit.com/r/skeptic/comments/16lkhq/this_sandy_hook_conspiracy_video_has_been_making/c7xjgzr

    ReplyDelete
  30. I live near Newtown, have friends in the school district there and around. None of us cannot guarantee that the bare facts of what is said do not have something else to it though I, personally don't believe the theories you and some others are coming up with. But do be aware that the little girl Emilie was in that school, was part of the class that was pretty much obliterated, died and was buried. Many who know the family well can tesify to that. Those photos are likely to be of her little sister who looks much like her, and was one of the siblings that Obama did meet when he went there. THe family also went to a White House tour two years ago, and some of the photos of that are being spread on the internet as being current. That little girl was shot and killed during what happened at Sandy Hook, and you are pouring salt in a family's wounds who lost their daughter. I won't address any of your other things as I don't know personally, but, yes, sweet Emilie Parker was killed that day, and she was a student in that school.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Please also be aware that the coroner had come out of autopsying the worst slaughter he had ever seen, and of small children. He was not prepared as he does prepare for court testimony, and was aware he was on national news, and that every word he would say would be under scrutiny and possible be drawn into law suits. And, oh there will be law suits from the families of those who were killed, and every word uttered by every official involved will be checked out for every possibility. No inside info on this, but I can tell you I would not have been one to have been able to articulate much of anything if I had been in the coroner's place, and coroners I know, say the same.

    ReplyDelete
  32. For anyone who trusts this gouvernment I suggest to visit this website: http://vigilantcitizen.com/category/sinistersites/ . I would be surprised that after carefully reading through some of these articles you would not ask yourself why the Denver airport has these strange paintings at the wall, why freemason and satanic signs are flashed at us by the Media constantly etc. I guess if this website does not wake you up it is simply too late and you were meant to stay in the dark.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't trust this government. I trust the Lord Jesus Christ. Which is why none of this conspiracy stuff bothers me in the least. I suppose if you are more worried about worldly things than spiritual, I could see how governmental conspiracies would be upsetting. But they don't bother me a bit.

      Delete
  33. I fully agree with you 100% that this was a staged/planned attack just like 911 in order to disarm the citizens and tear apart the constitution. Christians are under attack and need to wake up !! Please read this article which I feel is the truth behind it all.
    The entire international cabal is so large and far-reaching, its motives so wicked, its plan of attack so contrary to Christian thinking, that it simply staggers the mind when it is first exposed to view. But the results of its devastating influence may be seen both in history and among the nations today. It breathes the spirit of the last great Beast-Emperor described in Revelation 13.
    These are the subversive forces that have moved through the centuries, changing their form from time to time as governments have been made to heave, totter, cave in, and fall, but always with the same object in view, a final culmination when all nations will be leveled and a Super-Jewish State set up. This is the wicked goal of Jewish Communism.
    http://www.goodnewsaboutgod.com/studies/spiritual/home_study/jew_assault.htm

    ReplyDelete
  34. The same thing happened here, in Australia. You may know about it. Port Arthur massacre in Tasmania. Many believe it was an inside job to tighten up gun laws. A very weird story.

    PS: Reallly enjoy your blog and it has actually had an effect on me and changed me. I pray for you and your family and feel better knowing you are in the world. I try to take critism like a compliment like you do; I think I'm improving.

    ReplyDelete

Your KINDLY WORDED, constructive comments are welcome, whether or not they express a differing opinion. All others will be deleted without second thought.